If you were to talk about the
best video game ever made, you might describe it as ‘The Citizen Kane of video games’. You might describe New York City as ‘The Citizen Kane of cities’. Personally I mentioned in my review of The Room that it’s known as ‘The Citizen Kane of bad movies’ Citizen Kane has come to be used as a
bench mark for all that is great. The best of the best. The top ‘thing’ in any
particular field. This of course arose due to the 1941 films’ long held
standing of being the greatest motion picture ever made. For fifty years it
topped Sight and Sound’s poll of the
ten best movies of all time, it is listed as the AFI’s top movie and is
currently battling for top spot with one other on my Ultimate Greatest Films of All Time list which is under construction at time of writing.
To my great shame I’d never seen
the movie until today. I’m twenty-seven, have been interested in film for
nearly a decade and have been writing about the medium for over a year yet I’d
never seen the ‘greatest of them all’. If I’m honest I can’t put my finger on
why. The movie wasn’t difficult to track down; I have no issue with the black
and white, the time period or the subject matter. I think I’ve narrowed down my
reasons to two things. The first is the title. Citizen Kane doesn’t do anything for me and as titles go I don’t
think it’s particularly strong but I think the main reason was that I was
afraid of disappointment. So many times since I began to write my thoughts on
film I have been let down and then let down my readers when I didn’t get or
didn’t like classic, highly rated films. I think The Lion King is poor, I gave North by Northwest 6/10 and much of 8 ½ was lost on me. It was with great trepidation then that I
recently took the plunge and bought Citizen
Kane on Blu-ray. And was I disappointed? The short answer to that question
is, no. A slightly longer answer is No, I wasn’t and for a longer answer still,
you can read the next 1,110 words.
I’m not sure that Citizen Kane is the best movie ever
made. I’ve enjoyed a lot of films more and thought that a couple were of a
higher technical quality but I would ever argue with someone who gave their
opinion that it was the greatest motion picture of all time. To get it out of
the way, I’ll start with what I didn’t like about the movie. OK, now we can
move on to what I did like. Citizen Kane
was directed by Orson Welles who was twenty-five at the time of production.
While short on years he was even shorter in directorial experience. Although
successful on the stage and on the radio, the movie was his first. This boggles
my mind. I have two years on the Kane
era Welles and haven’t even crafted a movie as good as Mirror Mirror yet and while most his age were starting out in their
chosen professions, fetching coffee and trying to get noticed, Welles was busy
on what would turn into a cinematic masterpiece that has arguably never been
bettered. Not only did Welles direct but he also co-wrote, produced and starred
in the title role. Unusually he was afforded complete control over the movie
with a minimum of outside interference. Rarely has a director been given such
control over a movie by a studio and only Chaplin at his height springs to mind
as another example. Because of the complete artistic and creative freedom he
enjoyed, Welles was able to mould the movie by his rules and create the image
that was inside his head. Surprisingly given the critical success the movie was
met with, neither Welles nor any other director since was given such licence by
a major studio.
The movie’s plot borrows heavily
from the life of William Randolph Hearst, a wealthy newspaper magnate. This got
the film into trouble on its original release. Hearst’s influence threatened to
derail its circulation to the masses and almost certainly impacted on its
initial financial failures. The central character is also partly based on other
tycoons and the director himself but it’s the similarities to Hearst which are
not only most notable but also the most problematic. The movie opens on a
spellbinding sequence which shows the final moments of Charles Foster Kane
(Welles). As life slips from him, a close up of his lips shows the
pronouncement of his final word, ‘Rosebud’. What follows next is a brief
newsreel summary of the man’s life, from his humble Colorado beginnings to
sudden wealth, separation from his family, wild youth, marriages, successes,
failures, political aspirations and later hermit mannered old age. The newsreel
itself is fantastically exciting and intriguing but the reporters watching it
are curious as to the meaning of the man’s final word. What is Rosebud? What
does it mean, represent or stand for? Was it a person, a long lost love, or a
coded message? One reporter sets out to discover the meaning behind the word
and in a series of flashbacks, attempts to unravel its meaning.
The plot spans several decades
and while touching on Kane’s formative years, focuses mainly on his adult life,
from twenty-five to his mid seventies. The character through all this time is
played by Orson Welles who is sublime in the role and makes use of near perfect
makeup to add age and girth to his figure. The entire principle cast is made up
to be either younger or older at various times and for a film which is now itself
in its seventies, the effect is remarkable. The makeup is just one of the
superb effects which the film uses to fool the viewer’s eyes. In several scenes
Citizen Kane uses an optical printer
which creates composites of often two and sometimes three images to form a
single shot. This helps to form otherwise costly scenes and also helps to
maintain the film’s distinctive ‘universal focus’. We are used to movies
pulling focus on an item or character that is often in the foreground of the
shot. This means that the rest of the frame is out of focus. While this is
usually pretty and often effective for its purpose, for Citizen Kane, Orson Welles wanted to create a film which looked as
the eye saw the world. If you look up from your computer, phone, or tablet and
look ahead of you, most of what you see is in focus. Welles wanted his film to
look the same and employed cinematographer Gregg Toland who perfected the
director’s vision. As well as the distinctive focus, Citizen Kane also features beautiful lighting and innovative camera
placement which often shoots from ground level, meaning sets had to be built
with ceilings, something which was and still is, rare.
In addition to looking great, Citizen Kane also sounds great too. Bernard
Herrmann could legitimately be referred to as ‘The Citizen Kane of movie composers’. He is perhaps most famous for his
Hitchcock collaborations which included Psycho,
Vertigo and North by Northwest and his final score was for Taxi Driver but his first was for Citizen Kane. The music of the film is as revolutionary as any
other aspect and is notable for being intermittent rather than continual as was
the norm in 1941 and earlier. Herrmann used different musicians and orchestras
for different scenes and as such was able to include a variety of music to
match each scene. The music works perfectly in obedience with the visuals,
matching them for style and beauty every step of the way. Even the standard
positioning of microphones were re-written for the movie in order to capture the
various sounds from scenes on one track, rather than using a more conventional
multi track method.
What must be several hundred
words ago I joked that there was nothing that I disliked about this movie. That
wasn’t entirely true. Very occasionally I found my eyes wandering from the
screen and towards the window or my DVD collection. I have to be honest and say
that the film didn’t always hold my attention but this ocular wandering was a
rare occurrence. Generally my pupils were glued to the screen, flickering from
image to image, marvelling at the complexity and beauty of the visuals they
were converting for my brain. At the same time my ears were listening intently
to the well formed dialogue and delightfully executed sounds and music and my
mouth was curled into a smile. Many better film critics than myself will have undoubtedly
written many better reviews of Citizen
Kane than me, but I’m glad I can finally add my two thumbs up, my five
stars, my ten on ten to Citizen Kane,
possibly the best movie ever made.
10/10
Titbits
- Looking closely you'll notice that the camera looks up on stronger characters like Kane and Leland and down on weaker characters like Susan Alexander. This was a technique Welles borrowed from John Ford.
- The film was a box office failure and booed every time one of its nine Academy Award nominations was announced.
- Xanadu was based on William Randolph Hearst's own home and on Mont St. Michel in Normandy.
- During production Orson Welles chipped an ankle bone and directed for two weeks from a wheelchair. When needed in front of the camera he wore a metal leg brace.
It's brilliant no doubt. I'm in 100% agreement with you. It's also a movie that ages well. And as my appreciation for classic cinema deepens so does my love for this film.
ReplyDeleteI was skeptical before watching. I couldn't believe it was as good as I'd heard, but it bloody well is. I'm planning on a second watch soon as my girlfriend missed it and I want her to see it.
Delete