data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb298/eb2982d4bf3098cc6481c1352934d3ae2a223a35" alt=""
The documentary is created using a mixture of talking heads;
achieve home videos and convincing reconstructions which are themselves
combined with the talking heads. Almost all of the major players in the story
take part which is a little surprising as by the end hardly anyone comes out
with any sort of credibility.
I went into this film knowing the story having read about it
recently in a magazine. I knew very little about the film however and wasn’t
actually sure if it was a documentary or drama. The film plays its cards very
early and it isn’t exactly a spoiler, especially given the title, to tell you
that the person who returns home in 1997 is not Nicholas Barclay. The real
interest for the first half of the film at least, is how on earth this man
managed to convince Spanish officials, the American Embassy and most incredibly
the family of the missing boy that he was Nicholas. It’s almost too unreal to
be true. Without giving too much away, the man who claims to be the boy is of
French-Algerian descent and several years older than Barclay. He looks nothing
like the boy.