I saw this film a little by accident and although I wasn’t
as impressed with it as some others, I’m glad I saw it. We went to the cinema
to see Liberal Arts but after just
five days on release, it had been pulled by my local multiplex so we chose Wallflower instead. Charlie (Logan
Lerman) is nervous about starting his first day of High School and is already
counting down the days until he can graduate. He is smart and shy and has had a
tumultuous twelve months which only added to an already painful life. On his
first day he manages to avoid trouble but makes just one friend, his English
teacher (Paul Rudd) who spots something in Charlie and gives him extra work to
do at home. A few weeks into the school year though Charlie starts to become
friendly with step siblings Patrick (Ezra Miller) and Sam (Emma Watson) which
leads to a year of ups and downs on his road to manhood.
I’d describe The Perks
of Being a Wallflower as a grower, not a shower. I found the opening few
minutes difficult to enjoy and had little to relate to the main characters but
as it opened up it really grew on me and I found it charming. It’s as good a
High School film as I’ve seen this year and contains some nice messages and
great performances.
One of my initial problems with the film is that I found it
difficult to relate to the three central characters. I never went to an American High School
and school here in the UK
is a lot less segregated into social groups. I had friends who were jocks,
geeks, Goths, rockers etc so my High School experience was very different to
Charlie’s which itself seems to be an exaggeration of the normal US system. I
also had trouble relating to Charlie’s personal problems as they too were
something that had never affected me. I found it very difficult to put myself
in his shoes. As the film progressed though, this mattered less and less as the
story and characters developed around me. My second main problem was the David
Bowie issue. The three central characters talked continuously about their
favourite music with the likes of The Smiths, XTC and The Beatles being
mentioned but they had never heard or heard of David Bowie’s Heroes. I know the film was set in a
pre-internet age but surely one of them or one of their friends would have
known the song? If not, why not hum the tune to their parents. I just didn’t
buy it and it turned into quite a sizeable plot hole.
The fact that those were my only real problems goes to show
that I did quite like the film. The story grows increasingly complex and the
characters all come up against differing problems and barriers. I was especially
interested in Ezra Miller’s character’s arc. The third act drama could be seen
a mile off which was a shame but when we got to the reveal it was well dealt
with. The various relationships which grew and declined were also realistic and
well written. The writing on the whole was excellent. Something else I enjoyed
were the occasional Rocky Horror
scenes, and not just for Emma Watson’s costume, it’s one of my all time
favourites and Frank-N-Furter is a role that Ezra Miller was born to play. The
soundtrack is also impressive.
The three central actors were all very good although two of
them felt a little overpowered by Ezra Miller’s flamboyant performance. He
shows here that his turn in We Need to
Talk about Kevin was no fluke. He’s an actor with a very bright future.
Emma Watson is also impressive but through no fault of her own it’s difficult
to see past her Harry Potter
character. She goes a long way to put that behind her here though with an adult
performance and decent American accent. Maybe when her face begins to look more
adult it will be easier to put her child roles out of the mind. She still looks
very young. Central actor Logan Lermon isn’t an actor I’ve come across before
and underplays his character very well. He is surrounded by larger than life
characters but plays his role exceptionally well. I did find it difficult to
see past his waxwork like face and striking eyebrows though! Paul Rudd is also
great with another understated and less obviously comedic role than we’re used
to. Mae Whitman is another who delivers an excellent performance.
Overall The Perks of Being a Wallflower is a fine film but I
wasn’t enamoured with it. There is a lot to like with the script and acting
impressing me but there was nothing to push it over into the great category for
me and the third act reveal was far too obvious. Plus, It’s David Bowie!!
7/10
GFR 6.5/10
Hmm, I've noticed British viewers seem to be have more trouble connecting with this film. It's quite fascinating. Even though I didn't attend high school in the US, I did do my undergrad degree in a small liberal arts college where I could see the remnants of the cliques. Trust me, this film does not exaggerate. In fact, it may even underplay it. I'm sure Americans can attest to its realism.
ReplyDeleteNice review. Glad you liked the film.
Yeah it doesn't translate brilliantly this side of the Atlantic but it's still a good film.
DeleteLiberal Arts is something else that I don't really understand either to be honest! Is it like humanities subjects or something?
A liberal arts college (we tend to use the term "university" more if the school provides postgrad degrees as well, but it's the same thing) usually only gives undergrad degrees and are aimed at providing a comprehensive, broad education. So you end up doing courses in pretty much everything, regardless of your major. I did unusual courses like "Culture of Chocolate", "Beginning Acting Workshop", "Stagecraft(which I ended up dropping)" in addition to courses in literature, government, music, math, economics, statistics, all the sciences and Spanish.
DeleteAlso, unlike in the UK you don't actually apply to do any specific course. You spend the first 2 years doing whatever you want (you have requirements like an Arts course, Humanites course, Natural Sciences course etc) and then you declare your major in the 2nd semester of your sophomore(2nd) year. So, it gives you a lot of freedom to really figure out what you wanna do.
For example, I started out intending to be a biochemistry major, but by the time I reached the end of 2nd year I was able to switch to environmental studies.
I wouldn't trade my experience for the world, but the downside is that you end up without many specific skills. We all end up with a Bachelor of Arts degree, even if we majored in science. If you watch the Liberal Arts trailer he says "I was an English major with a minor in History, just to make sure I was fully unemployable". That line is so true for me!
I hope this all makes sense. :)
Yeah I get it, thanks. I've always thought our degrees were a bit limiting. I have a degree in Politics and International Relations but had no opportunity to study anything outside that. I'd have thought the US system would be better as you can get a broad understanding and try various areas before specialising. I studied just politics from age 21. Cheers!
Delete