Second World War veteran Freddie Quell (Joaquin Phoenix) is
struggling to get to grips with civilian life five years after the end of the
war. Obsessed with sex and with a severe drink problem he stows aboard a boat
after leaving yet another job. The boat he is on is home to a party being
thrown by Lancaster Dodd (Philip Seymour Hoffman). Dodd known as The Master
takes an interest in the wondering mind of Freddie and introduces him to ‘The
Cause’, a philosophical group that Dodd controls. The Master attempts to
control Freddie’s drink problem and bring him deeper into his inner circle,
often against the wishes of those closest to him.
I’d been looking forward to The Master for months having heard great things from festivals and
then its US
release. I feel really disappointed then that I walked out of the cinema
feeling tired and underwhelmed. Despite many positives the film went nowhere
and felt slow and dull.
Starting with the positives of which there are many, the
film looks beautiful. The cinematography, set design and whole look is
stunning. The film magnificently captures the early 1950s look. Director Paul Thomas Anderson never has a problem with crafting a
film which looks good but I have to question the substance. There Will be Blood is one of my
favourite films looks wise but it, like this is long and dull. With both films
you get the feeling that you will be ultimately rewarded but unlike Blood, the reward never comes here. The
film drags along, trying to find somewhere to go but goes around and around in
circles before falling flat and staying still. As well as the beautiful visuals
the film sounds absolutely incredible. The soundtrack was one of my favourite
things. Radiohead’s Jonny Greenwood is becoming a hot property when it comes to
film scores with the likes of Norwegian Wood and There Will be Blood
already behind him he excels himself here with a fantastic score. It reminded
me of a Noir detective thriller at times, featuring plenty of double bass and
wood block combining with woodwind. Four songs from the era are also used to
great effect.
One of the great strengths is the acting. There are three
stunning performances but it is Joaquin Phoenix who steals the show with his
mesmerising, out of control performance. Phoenix
kept reminding me of a mixture between early DeNiro and Michael Shannon. He
goes all out for his role and isn’t afraid of going over the top when required.
I’m sure he must have hurt himself in a couple of scenes too. Philip Seymour
Hoffman’s performance would usually be show stopping but is slightly overshadowed
by his co-star’s more in your face showing. Hoffman on the contrary to Phoenix delivers an
extremely controlled and managed performance. He is charismatic and strong but
is also able to fade in to the background and observe when necessary. At the
push of a button though he is able to increase his presence and come to the
fore. Amy Adams could easily be overlooked behind the two leads but she too is
excellent, her character often seemingly like the puppet master behind the
scenes. Someone else I liked was Rami Malek who was more than solid.
Back to the problems though. Despite the links with
Scientology and the fact that the film is meant to be loosely based upon the
life of L.Ron Hubbard amongst other things, I don’t feel as though I learned
anything new about the cult or gained any sort of insight as to their beliefs
or practices. As I’ve previously mentioned I also found the film really dull.
There were vast tracks of time where things were happening but they weren’t at
all interesting. As a character study the film is a success but there is a
severe lack of plot. I have no problem with films which are slow or take their
time to go where they are going but this doesn’t go anywhere. I saw the film on
my own so will probably end up watching it again with my girlfriend; I just
hope I get more from it the second time around.
6/10
No comments:
Post a Comment