When I first heard that one of my favourite directors was
leaving his native Korea
to make an English language film I was excited but also as worried as when I
heard Spike Lee was remaking Oldboy.
My worry grew when earlier this year Kim Ji-woon’s US debut The Last Stand failed to live up to his
back catalogue. In Stoker though,
director Park Chan-wook has created a film which I believe can sit happily
alongside his previous films. Stoker
is unmistakably a Park Chan-wook film and he has lost nothing in translation.
It is as dark and stylish as you’d expect from the director of Thirst and I’m a Cyborg and features a typically bold and beautiful colour
palate.
Following the death of Richard Stoker, his enigmatic younger
brother Charlie (Matthew Goode) comes to stay with his wife Evelyn (Nicole
Kidman) and teenage daughter India
(Mia Wasikowska). Uncle Charlie was previously unknown to India as he was
never mentioned by her father. India
is slow to accept Charlie into the family but a tender bond slowly forms
between the two cold and indecipherable people. India remains apprehensive though
and Charlie’s motives for the sudden visit remain unclear.
Stoker is the most
beautiful film I’ve seen since Life of Pi.
I personally believe that there is no director working today who is capable of
making films as visually stunning as Park on a consistent basis. Park brings
with him his long time cinematographer Chung Chung-hoon who helps to create the
startling imagery. Park’s films stand out on their own for the sharpness of
each line and contour seen on screen. It sometimes looks as though someone has
drawn around every single line with a thin black pen to separate each person
and object. It’s a remarkable and telltale sign that you are watching a Park
Chan-wook film. Something else which is unmistakably Park is the vibrant colour
palate. The film was so bright and colourful that the red brick and grey sky of
Manchester felt
washed out in comparison on my drive home. Each colour on screen perfectly
complements its neighbours and is stronger than you’d expect. Kidman’s bright
orange hair shines against her ivory skin which is set off beautifully against
a bright blue dress. The house in which the plot mostly takes place is full of
deep and unusual colours such as dark purples and pastel lime greens. It
reminded me a lot of Park’s segment Cut
in the film Three Extremes.
Inside the central house it feels as though time stands
still. From what you see inside alone it would be difficult to place the movie
into any particular time period. The plot could equally be taking place in 1960
or 2013. It is only when the action is taken outside that the modern world
encroaches on the eerily still waters that lie inside the house. The costumes
are stunning and appear to place the film in the early 60s. Park’s direction
is, thankfully, perfect for Stoker.
He captures the unusual angles and quirky moments perfectly with his trademark
framing and moving camera. The sets, cinematography, camera trickery and
movement all add up to make Stoker
sublimely beautiful.
I always try to avoid trailers and reviews for films before
seeing them myself but what little I’d heard of Stoker gave the impression that it was a film of style over
substance. I disagree with this assessment. I think the movie has the substance
to match the style. The plot is very Hitchcockian in its tentative build up of apprehension
and had the film been made fifty or sixty years ago I could see Hitchcock
directing it. The creeping sense of fear and danger follows Hitch’s work
closely and even the character of Uncle Charlie shares many of the character
traits of the character of the same name in Hictchcock’s 1943 film Shadow of a Doubt. Both Charlie’s show
signs of predatory and incestuous behaviour and both, it feels, are capable of
inflicting pain and suffering on those who get in the way. Both men turn up out
of the blue and both are charming and seductive. Matthew Goode even has a look
of Joseph Cotten about him.
One of the film’s central themes is sexual awakening and the
search for who you are. India
begins the film as a child in a woman’s body and slowly discovers her sexual
side, albeit with the help of her mother and uncle. A turning point is the
incredible piano scene which begins as a slow dance, building slowly before
becoming entangled like an erupting orgasm. The music mirrors the feelings of
passion and excitement as toes are curled in ecstasy. It’s an astonishing scene
and a watershed moment for the film. My girlfriend felt that the film went off
the boil in the final third but for me it remained true to its earlier promise.
India is trying to decide who and what she is and at various times attempts to
become each of her three role models from her hunter father, vixen like mother
and hawk like uncle Charlie. Stoker is
about self discovery and the trials one must go through in order to find out
who you really are.
The relationship between India and Charlie is one full of
menace and danger but also great beauty. There are obvious creepy moments as
the couple are related but there is also an innocence and sense that both are
leading each other towards becoming who they really are. Mia Wasikowska is
brilliant as India.
I’ve been a fan of hers since Alice in
Wonderland and she was great in The
Kids are All Right but she has never been better than this. She carries
much of the film on her young shoulders and never feels out of place as the
Wednesday Addams-esque grieving teen. Nicole Kidman continues her run of
choosing films wisely and is also outstanding as the mother. Matthew Goode is
also excellent as Charlie. He is dark, mysterious and cold but chillingly
charming and plays the role pitch perfect.
Overall I thought Stoker
was a fantastic film and I really want to see it again already. It was
incredibly beautiful, the sound and score were great and the acting was
wonderful. The plot chugs along, full of mystery and intrigue and for me it is
strong right to the very end. I’m really happy that Park Chan-wook has
continued his strong run of powerful, beautiful and challenging films while
working in unfamiliar surroundings. Long may his run continue.
9/10
GFR 8/10
Titbits
- The movie was written under a pseudonym by actor Wentworth Miller of Prison Break fame.
- The script was included on 2010s 'Black List' - the list of best unproduced scripts in Hollywood.
- Carey Mulligan and Jodie Foster were originally cast but dropped out.
Nice review! I'm so excited to see this one.
ReplyDeleteIt doesn't disappoint.
DeleteGlad you liked it.
ReplyDeleteYou're right about the visuals being as beautiful as Life of Pi. I'm really excited to see more from Park. I think his first venture into the Hollywood studio system has been a success.
Even more exciting is the supposed extra 20 minutes or so that were cut out. Hopefully these will be on the DVD/blu-ray!
Ooh excellent. I didn't know about that. I can't wait. This will look incredible on Blu-Ray
DeleteUm, can't wait to check this movie out. Good job :)
ReplyDelete9/10!! Awesome.
ReplyDeleteI was unsure whether I would see this film, however I love Oldboy so much that it would be doing a disservice for me to miss it. I'd heard mostly negative reviews but this has re-installed my confidence.
I'd heard the odd negative thing too but I loved it. Hope you enjoy it.
DeleteMake FREE bitcoins over at DailyFreeBits. Up to 1,000 satoshi every 60 minutes.
ReplyDelete