This 2002 supernatural thriller is based on the true events
of a 1967 disaster that struck a small town in West Virginia. It wasn’t a film I’d ever
heard of and had read nothing of it before seeing it. The DVD was leant to me
by a friend at work. I have serious problems with the idea, plot, direction and
acting but my enjoyment increased the longer I stuck with it. Despite finding
little pleasure for most of the two hours, by the end I was satisfied that I’d
seen a fairly gripping and occasionally interesting thriller.
Two years after his wife’s death, newspaper columnist John
Klein (Richard Gere) is driving south from Washington
DC to Richmond,
Virginia when his car breaks
down. To his shock he discovers that he has broken down far west of where he
thought he was and is in fact on the West Virginia
– Ohio border, in the small town of Mount Pleasant. The town
is home to some unexplained apparitions and premonitions which mirror those
that plagued his wife in the hours before her death. People even begin drawing
pictures that look like her own and when the predictions begin to come true,
Klein attempts to track down the strange Mothman who is spotted all over town.
Although the film is based on the true events of a small
town disaster which did in fact kill over forty people, there is little in the
movie which I believe. Just because people say they see something unexplained
and then a bad thing happens, doesn’t mean the two are connected. The character
of the Mothman is something which is found in many different cultures but so
are ghosts, fairies and gods. I had a big problem getting on board with the
film because it sells itself as being true. There are obviously areas of truth
in it but the rest is supernatural nonsense. I think I’d have enjoyed the film
a lot more if it had been sold as a straight paranormal thriller. Instead there
are notes both before and after the film which discuss the true events. This
blurs both the reality and fiction.
The plot itself is sometimes interesting but only gripped me
towards the end. I wasn’t particularly invested in any of the characters and
have to be honest and say that I have no love for the actors. Richard Gere
leads and is an actor I have few nice things to say about. How he has got by
for thirty years with his chipmunk smile and overly blinking eyes, I don’t
know. His wife is played by Debra Messing of Will & Grace fame but thankfully she dies early on. Laura
Linney is an actress whom I do enjoy to see on screen but she is given very
little to do besides investigate the odd event, provide exposition and act as a
love interest in an under explored yet dragged out love story. Things unravel
at a decent pace and I was intrigued by the strange happenings, apparitions and
premonitions and the final twenty minutes are very good. I found the ending
poor though and was left far too open. I have no problem with films that leave
the audience with questions but this movie didn’t make me want to ask any, nor
have any answered.
Early on in the film I had an issue with the direction. At
the turn on the millennium, directors like David Fincher and Christopher Nolan
were crafting edgy, intense thrillers like Seven,
Memento and Fight Club. These
films were dark, complex and interesting and had a very distinctive and gritty
visual style. It sometimes feels as though The
Mothman Prophecies is attempting the same style but fails to deliver.
There’s unusual camera positioning, odd fades and wipes and some zooming
techniques which look similar to those employed in the aforementioned films but
look like cheep knock offs of the real thing. I found the direction distracting
but I can’t say whether it bothered me because I wasn’t interested in the plot
or if the plot didn’t interest me because I was distracted by the direction.
Either way, both counteracted me enjoyment. Having said all that though, as the
film progressed I found that the stylistic choices worked better and I began to
enjoy them and the film more.
I feel as though I’ve been overly harsh on this movie and it
certainly isn’t a bad film. The direction and style is interesting, if not
always successful and the story reaches some interesting apexes before it veers
off again. Richard Gere isn’t bad and any animosity I have towards him is
purely my own problem. I wouldn’t watch the movie again but wouldn’t advise
others to avoid it.
5/10
Titbits
- The studio cut the film's budget by $2 million just days before shooting began.
- Director Mark Pellington has a cameo as a bartender and also the voice of the Mothman.
- The paranormal expert in the movie is called Leek, the reverse of the source text's author, Keel.
No comments:
Post a Comment