I was hoping to catch Society at a recent Grimm Up North
screening but I unfortunately missed it because of work. Luckily, a guy at work
is a huge horror fan and lent me a DVD copy. What intrigued me about the film
was that it has been described as ‘a minor classic in the body horror
sub-genre’. Regular readers might know that I’m not a huge horror fan but I do
enjoy a bit of crazy, no holds barred body horror from time to time. Give me a
film in which a man punches through another man’s stomach until his fist comes
out of his mouth before turning him inside out and I’m there!
For much of its runtime Society plays as a kind of 1980s soap
opera crossed with a soft-core erotic thriller and the first hour provides
nothing beyond a bit of intrigue and laughter at the 80s hair and poor
dialogue. The final half hour though is some of the weirdest stuff I’ve seen on
screen and makes up for the poor opening. Bill Whitney (Billy Warlock) is a
rich kid who attends Beverly
Hills Academy
and lives at home with his parents and Sister Jenny (Patrice Jennings). For
some reason Bill feels like he doesn’t fit in and starts to wonder if he’s even
related to the family who are showing signs of unusual behaviour.

The closing thirty minutes or so
are totally bonkers and really fun. Bodies melt into one another and they meld
and deform into hideous creatures who eat the poor to stay rich. The film is
heavy on the social commentary which can be seen throughout the movie but is
visualised brilliantly in these scenes. I’d urge anyone with more than a
passing interest in Cronenbergian body horror to give the last third of this
movie a watch as it’s some of the weirdest and funniest gloopy prosthetic work
I’ve seen. The images are highly original and twisted and work well as the
visual metaphor for which they are designed.

Society is a horror which has a nice central idea and an incredible
way of visualising that idea. The effects are brilliantly weird and outlandish
and had me both laughing as well as gasping. The film drags slightly before
opening itself up and the acting was awful but on the whole I enjoyed the film
despite and perhaps because of its flaws.
6/10
The way you describe that third act makes it look like one I should seek out. I don't mind the bad 80's fashion because in a few years they will say the same thing about some of the stuff we wear. Great post
ReplyDeleteEven if you just fast forward the rest of the movie, the third act is well worth watching.
Delete