Based on Cornell Woolrich’s short story It Must be Murder, Alfred Hitchcock’s 1954 Mystery film is regarded
as one of the Director’s finest. Having broken his leg while away on an
assignment, photographer Jeff Jefferies (James Stewart) whiles away the hours
watching his neighbours from the window of his apartment. One day he wakes up
to discover that a woman across the courtyard is no longer there and her
husband is acting suspiciously. With the help of his girlfriend Lisa Freemont
(Grace Kelly), Jeff investigates his suspected murder case from the confines of
his window side wheelchair.
I’ve only seen around half a dozen of Hitchcock’s films but
I’ve found that my favourites are those which I have heard nothing about. I was
a little bit disappointed by North by Northwest but loved Rope and Shadow of a Doubt. Rear Window falls somewhere in between. I can certainly see why it
is considered so great but there are films in the Director’s extensive cannon
which are just as if not more impressive.
The suspense and mystery slowly builds throughout the film
as hints are dropped and ideas quashed. Theories come and go, filling ones head
with all sorts of ideas. At the same time the audience can make up their own
mind given the facts laid out in front of them. The audience sees exactly what
Jeff sees through his apartment window. A clever camera technique also means
that if Jeff is simply looking out of the window we see a wide shot, if he uses
binoculars then we get a close up. I thought that was a masterful way of
showing what was going on and created the voyeur feel that encompasses the
film. Jeff’s broken leg and confinement also creates a feeling of
claustrophobia which when added to the mystery across the courtyard, makes one
want to leap out of the confines of the apartment and investigate. Although the
mystery was well set up I thought that its conclusion lacked tension. The
hanging from the window scene was good but following that everything was tied
up far too neatly. The sped up shots of people running out of their apartments
also looked wrong.
The set is probably one of the finest I’ve ever seen. I
absolutely loved it. There was so much detail and realism in it that when I
first saw it I wasn’t sure it was a soundstage set. It is also enormous for the
period. Perhaps the most impressive aspect of the set is how it is filled with
what feels like a realistic neighbourhood of people. There are several
characters that we never really meet but by the end, feel as we know. Miss
Torso (Georgine Darcy) for instance is a young ballet dancer who spends a lot
of time practicing in her underwear. Through Jeff’s eyes we get to know about
her and her habits despite never actually hearing her speak or meeting her
close up. The same can be said for Miss Lonelyhearts (Judith Evelyn). It is
clear from Jeff’s observations that she is a lonely middle aged woman who is in
need of company. Her arc also contains something which was just as tense as the
murder mystery in the apartment above hers. I found it incredible that the
lives of the characters were so laid out for us when we never meet them in the
traditional sense. The feat shows extraordinary work on the part of the Writer
and Director.
Of the central characters I found the acting to be
excellent. James Stewart gives a calm and delivered performance with that voice
of his, somewhere between Christopher Walken and a hiccupping salesman. His
lack of mobility could have hindered his performance but he seems to use it to
his advantage as he relies on facial rather than bodily expression. I found his
character’s initial lack of enthusiasm for his girlfriend a little odd though
given who she was. Grace Kelly is just as good as Stewart, in a prominent and
strong role. Rather than playing a typical 50s female role she is given
something with which she can sink her teeth into. Both actors have great
chemistry despite the obvious age difference. I also really enjoyed Thelma
Ritter’s performance as Jeff’s nurse. She was straight talking and inquisitive
and often quite funny. Raymond Burr is creepy enough to be believable as a
killer but no so much that you don’t buy his innocence.
Overall I really enjoyed Rear
Window. I can see its charm and understand the reasons behind its success
but I wasn’t as big a fan of the mystery element as I was the set design and
Direction. I like what the film says about voyeurism and how it suggests that
we find parallels in our own lives. It also seems to suggest that fixation on
one area can lead you to miss things in other areas. What's more I wish I’d
seen the film before 2007s Disturbia
which was loosely based on the picture, as that was pants.
8/10
No comments:
Post a Comment