The Hunter was a
film I began to hear good things about late last spring but was unfortunately
unable to find a screening anywhere close to my local area (which happens to be
the third largest city in the UK).
In the end I probably saved myself a needless trip to the local Art House
Cinema as although featuring some decent moments and a good central
performance, The Hunter isn’t a film
worth writing home about.
A mercenary/hunter (Willem Defoe) is employed by a shady
European biotech company to travel to Tasmania
and track the illusive, presumed extinct Tasmanian Tiger. The animal, which
hasn’t been seen in the wild since 1930 is believed to have had a venom in its
bite which was capable of paralysing its prey. The company, Red Leaf, wish to
extract that venom for use in their biotechnology business. When he arrives in Tasmania, the hunter
stays with a family who have recently experienced loss and attracts the
unwanted attention of local loggers who are fearful for their jobs.
The Hunter is set in
a beautiful part of the world which I have rarely seen on film before. Tasmania goes against all the stereotypes of what Australia
should look like and for me was a breath of fresh air. Defoe’s lodgings
reminded me of something you’d see in the likes of Winters Bone but are inhabited by much nicer people and I enjoyed
spending time with the Armstrong family with whom Defoe becomes acquainted. The
forests and plateau in which the hunter searches for the tiger are stunningly
beautiful and if not for some less than inviting locals the film could be used
by the Tasmanian Tourist Board.
The plot is fairly engaging and spends around equal time in
the wild and at the family cabin. Defoe has a dual role in the film as carer
for the family’s two young children and hunter of the tiger. He performs both
roles perfectly. A problem with his character though is that the writing gave
no indication that he was any better than trackers and hunters who had come
before him. Given that he is hunting something as illusive as the Tasmanian
Tiger you’d expect him to be a super human hunter, a sort of Bear Grylls meets
Rambo, and while it’s obvious he can handle himself in the wild, the character
lacks the sort of super human skills and ability which you’d be looking for.
Although this helps to ground the character in reality, any other person could
have done what he had in the last seventy or so years. The dual nature of the
plot though kept me interested and I was just as curious to rediscover the
tiger as I was to see how the family got on. I didn’t really see either
conclusion coming.
Willem Defoe is on screen for probably around 90% of the
time and delivers a characteristically nuanced performance. His face is so full
of expression while hardly moving and it is obvious that he has taken the time
to learn what he is doing in the bush. From the trailer I was expecting a
slightly more frenetic and anxious performance which in the end never
materialised but what we got was equally as good. His weathered face perfectly matches his surroundings. In addition to Defoe I also
thought that Sam Neill and Frances O’Connor were fine while young Morgana Davis
and Finn Woodlock were both excellent.
The Hunter is a
slow burner which I’m thinking more of now I’m writing about it than I did
while watching and it has a good story and very good performances but there was
nothing evident which tipped it towards being any better than just good.
6/10
No comments:
Post a Comment