A lonely but imaginative boy is fed up with being ignored at
home and after an argument with his mother, runs away. He reaches a pond and
gets into a small sailing boat. The pond soon becomes a sea and after days
afloat he finds himself on an island inhabited with seven giant creatures.
Spotting a similarity between himself and the destructive Carol (James
Gandolfini) the boy Max (Max Records) soon finds himself in the middle of the
group and convinces them he is a King in order to stop them eating him. Each
monster is like a version of Max and themes of jealousy, fear, boredom and
frustration are the same which trouble pre teen children as they grow up.
I never saw the film on its initial release back in 2009 but
had heard some good things about it. A quick search confirms that it appeared
on numerous Top 10 lists but for me it isn’t quite that good. I thought the
effects and cinematography were excellent and the story had its moments but it
was also a little dull in places and the sort of film which I’d rather have
watched in my early teens.
Although based on a children’s book and featuring a young
lead, the film is packaged as more of an adult film. I’m sure it would appeal
to children but it doesn’t treat its audience like idiots. The script is well
fleshed out, clever and witty and was a surprise to me. I wasn’t expecting such
an adult tale. Even though it’s clever, the film can be viewed on two levels.
On the one hand it can be seen as a simple children’s adventure story but if
you wish to look deeper you can see that the story is about childhood angst.
Max’s personality is fractured and shined back in his face with the various
creatures he meets and his attempts to bring the group together can be seen as
his subconscious trying to bring himself together before he can go back to his
family.
The opening act feels very low budget due to the way it is
filmed. Handheld cameras are used and the film has a gritty look. As soon as we
encounter the creatures though the film takes on a glossy sheen but still
somehow remains grounded in reality. The visual effects are superb. Using a
combination of animatronics, suit work and CGI the creatures still look
fantastic three years on. The visual style on the whole is really impressive
and I could have watched the monsters move about all day. The voice acting not
only matches the physical personalities of the creatures but like the script
are very adult sounding. Max Records gives a great performance too.
Where the Wild Things
Are had a budget of $100 million which is unbelievable. Although less than
half the budget of the likes of Avatar,
$100 million for a film on this scale seems expensive. It’s not surprising then
that the movie failed to make a profit. Overall Where the Wild Things Are is a
visually assured and interesting children’s adventure which has enough to
appeal to both children and adults alike but as a result it fails to park
itself as a favourite for either group.
6/10
GFR 5/10
I was surprised the movie got a lot of backlash from audiences when the author himself praised the movie. I though Spike Jonze captured childhood very honestly in this story. I was glad to see a story where children get angry and frustrated.
ReplyDeleteI also limed to see a film about childhood anger. I think the backlash might stem from the inability to pigeonhole the film.
Delete