Seeing Monsters University puts me in the strange situation of seeing a
sequel (or prequel in this case) before the original movie. Like a lot of
people I’m a huge Pixar fan but 2001’s Monsters.
Inc is one of two Pixar features which I haven’t got around to seeing yet.
The central characters Mike and Sully are so well known though that I didn’t
think my ignorance of the first movie would hamper my enjoyment of this one.
Thankfully it didn’t. Pixar managed to hamper it all by themselves.
Monsters University
takes us back to our central character’s college days where they first meet on
the campus of the University of the movie’s title. The ambitious and book smart
Mike (Billy Crystal) initially doesn’t get along with the confident and naturally
scary Sully (John Goodman) and their falling out leads to their expulsion from
Scare 101. The pair discovers that their only way back onto the course is to
enter and win the University’s Scare Games. To do this they must join a
fraternity but the only one that will accept them is a group of no-hopers. Will
they be able to shape themselves and their team into first class scarers or
will their dream of turning professional be lost?
Pixar have had mixed fortunes
with sequels in the past. The Toy Story
films went from brilliant to great to sublime through the course of the trilogy
while Cars went from bad to worse.
It’s difficult for me to judge Monsters University
against the original as I haven’t seen it but it feels as though this is more a
Cars 2 than Toy Story 2. I’d go so far as to say that of the twelve Pixar
features I’ve seen, this one would rank at ten or eleven. In the past Pixar
have created visionary worlds and extraordinary stories from bold or even mad
ideas but here they take one of their bold ideas (i.e. the first film) and
create a paint by numbers coming of age story which feels as though it was
co-written by mumsnet.
The world created by the Monsters films is vivid and beautifully
designed while the central idea of running a monsters world on children’s
scares is inspired. It just feels like the idea for this prequel was either
rushed or not fully considered and this is unusual for a studio which is
probably the cleverest or at least fullest of ideas that currently operates.
There’s nothing in Monsters University
to excite or inspire the audience and the overarching conceit that teamwork is
best feels rammed down the audience’s throats. In Wall-E the environmental and health themes were subtle and
tastefully written but here there might as well just be a constant subtitle
reading “TEAMWORK WINS”. The plot and its development are also really
conventional and there are no interesting turns or deviations along the way.
The whole film is a bit dull.
As well as failing to excite, it
also failed to make me laugh much. I know that Pixar make what are essentially
children’s films but generally their output is universal, true family films
which can be enjoyed by any age. In the busy screening I sat in today, all ages
from around three to sixty were accounted for but there was just one lone
middle aged man laughing. To be honest, he might have had heat-stroke or
something because he was laughing at every line. The children, teenagers and
adults barely raised a giggle and I could tell that the teens especially were
getting restless. The two occasions that the film did raise a titter from my
stern face were brief. The first is something I’d seen in the trailer and
involved a slug type monster and the second was an elderly, middle of the road
woman’s musical choice. Aside from those occasions I did not laugh. A major
problem with that is that I didn’t laugh at any of the principle characters,
compelling as they are. What the film does manage to capture is the sense of
College life, or at least the sense of College life that I’ve seen in other
films.
Pizza Planet truck |
Where Pixar always manages to
excel, no matter what their story is, is in their design and animation. The
array of monsters to appear on screen is mind-boggling. It’s a testament to
their craft and ingenuity that they managed to create so many different
monsters. There are scenes were upwards of a hundred appear all at once and not
one is alike. Not only are they different but in most cases they’re interesting
to look at. Sully’s fur is a thing of beauty with each strand standing out from
its neighbours. The film looks incredible.
Overall though that’s where the
beauty of this film ends for me. I expected more from my favourite studio and
left feeling bitterly disappointed. The movie feels longer than its 103 minutes
and the knockout style University Games acts as a slow timer to the end which
feels like it just won’t come. The film isn’t particularly interesting or funny
and wastes a wonderfully imagined world on a story that has been seen time and
time again.
5/10
As they always do, Pixar
accompany their feature with a short. Monsters University
is preceded by The Blue Umbrella, a
sweet romance between two colourful umbrellas in a world of black and grey.
Pixar often use their shorts as a way of producing some of their more off-beat
ideas and this is certainly true here. The story has a timeless feel and is
both charming and delightful. The animation is so good that it took a few
seconds for my eyes to adjust to the idea that it was in fact animation. It has
a particularly realistic look to it. The umbrella’s features are simply drawn
with smooth, black lines and this works in a nice juxtaposition to the rest of
the animation. I enjoyed this seven minute short more than the main feature.
We've definitely taken a lot of the same things from this one. Agreed that the variety of Monsters is pretty mind-boggling, but I often felt this was being used as 'look how imaginative' we are distraction from the lack of imagination on the actual story.
ReplyDeleteI think you're right. It was almost as though they realised the story was weak so tried to distract the audience in other ways.
DeleteDude, you really have to see Monsters Inc; my favourite Pixar, probably. The story is so clever and ingenious; I really didn't see how they would top it in MU and it sounds like they didn't. Your brief synopsis confirmed all my suspicions that it just wasn't inventive. I don't think I'll have time to see this one, but it doesn't sound like I'll miss very much.
ReplyDeleteBut hey, I'm the guy who didn't like UP!